4.8 Article

Combined total genome loss of heterozygosity scan of breast cancer stroma and epithelium reveals multiplicity of stromal targets

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 20, Pages 7231-7236

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2866

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30CA16058, P01CA97189-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent breast cancer studies have highlighted the importance of interactions between cancer epithelium and tumor stroma. Recently, the focus of solid tumor investigations has shifted from mutations in carcinomatous epithelium to disturbances of tissue organization in cancer. The genetic basis of this microenvironment, however, remains to be clarified. To begin to resolve this problem, a total genome loss of heterozygosity (LOH) scan was done on epithelial and stromal DNA from 134 sporadic invasive breast carcinomas. In addition to detecting more frequent LOH at three loci in stroma than in epithelium, we found strong evidence that LOH frequencies were significantly elevated in specific regions of each chromosome. We detected 57 markers, which were preferentially lost either in stroma (n = 38) or epithelium (n = 19), relative to the background LOH frequencies on their respective chromosomes. This multiplicity of stromal cell LOH, and hence loss of genetic material, provides a possible mechanism for interpatient variation in host-stromal response to invading adenocarcinoma cells. This is consistent with a model in which initial, random LOH occurs equally among epithelium and stroma, but subsequent clonal selection is driven by factors, which appear to be distinctly different between malignant epithelial and surrounding stromal cells. Genetic alterations in stroma did not mimic those in epithelium, but they could play a different and parallel role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, probably by modifying some features specific to breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available