4.7 Article

Midline carcinoma of children and young adults with NUT rearrangement

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages 4135-4139

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.107

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K08 CA92158-01, R01 CA088004-08, R01 CA088004] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose A balanced chromosomal translocation, t(15;19), resulting in the BRD4-NUT oncogene, has been identified in a lethal carcinoma of young people, a disease described primarily in case reports. We sought to amass a more definitive series of tumors with NUT and/or BRD4 gene rearrangements and to determine distinct clinicopathologic features. Patients and Methods Carcinomas (N = 98) in young individuals (median age, 32.5 years) were screened for NUT and BRD4 rearrangements using dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Four published carcinomas with BRD4 and NUT rearrangements were also evaluated. Immunophenotypic analyses were performed. Results Eleven tumors had NUT gene rearrangements, including eight with BRD4-NUT fusions and three with novel rearrangements, which were designated as NUT variant. All NUT-rearranged carcinomas (NRCs) arose from midline epithelial structures, including the first example arising below the diaphragm. Patients were young (median age, 17.6 years). Squamous differentiation (seen in 82% of NRCs) was particularly striking in NUT-variant cases. In this first description of NUT-variant carcinomas, the average survival (96 weeks, n = 3) was longer than for BRD4-NUT carcinomas (28 weeks, n = 8). Strong CD34 expression was found in six of 11 NRCs but in zero of 45 NUT wild-type carcinomas. Conclusion NRCs arise from midline structures in young people, and NRCs with BRD4-NUT are highly lethal, despite intensive therapies. NUT-variant carcinomas might have a less fulminant clinical course than those with BRD4-NUT fusions. CD34 expression is characteristic in NRCs and, therefore, holds promise as a diagnostic test for this distinctive clinicopathologic entity. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available