4.6 Article

Duration of infection and antigen display have minimal influence on the kinetics of the CD4+ T cell response to Listeria monocytogenes infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 9, Pages 5679-5687

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5679

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI50073, AI42767, AI46653] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The T cell response to infection consists of clonal expansion of effector cells, followed by contraction to memory levels. It was previously thought that the duration of infection determines the magnitude and kinetics of the T cell response. However, recent analysis revealed that transition between the expansion and contraction phases of the Ag-specific CD8(+) T cell response is not affected by experimental manipulation in the duration of infection or Ag display. We studied whether the duration of infection and Ag display influenced the kinetics of the Ag-specific CD4(+) T cell response to Listeria monocytogenes (LM) infection. We found that truncating infection and Ag display with antibiotic treatment as early as 24 It postinfection had minimal impact on the expansion or contraction of CD4(+) T cells; however, the magnitudes of the Ag-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses were differentially affected by the timing of antibiotic treatment. Treatment of LM-infected mice with antibiotics at 24 h postinfection did not prevent generation of detectable CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells at 28 days after infection, vigorous secondary expansion of these memory T cells, or protection against a subsequent LM challenge.. These results demonstrate that events within the first few days of infection stimulate CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses that are capable of carrying out the full program of expansion and contraction to functional memory, independently of prolonged infection or Ag display.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available