4.4 Article

Temporal analysis of Coxiella burnetii morphological differentiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 21, Pages 7344-7352

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.21.7344-7352.2004

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coxiella burnetii undergoes a poorly defined developmental cycle that generates morphologically distinct small-cell variants (SCV) and large-cell variants (LCV). We developed a model to study C. burnetii morphogenesis that uses Vero cells synchronously infected with homogeneous SCV (Nine Mile strain in phase II) harvested from aged infected cell cultures. A time course transmission electron microscopic analysis over 8 days of intracellular growth was evaluated in conjunction with one-step growth curves to correlate morphological differentiations with growth cycle phase. Lag phase occurred during the first 2 days postinfection (p.i.) and was primarily composed of SCV-to-LCV morphogenesis. LCV forms predominated over the next 4 days, during which exponential growth was observed. Calculated generation times during exponential phase were 10.2 h (by quantitative PCR assay) and 11.7 h (by replating fluorescent focus-forming unit assay). Stationary phase began at approximately 6 days p.i. and coincided with the reappearance of SCV, which increased in number at 8 days p.i. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR demonstrated maximal expression of scvA, which encodes an SCV-specific protein, at 8 days p.i., while immunogold transmission electron microscopy revealed degradation of ScvA throughout lag and exponential phases, with increased expression observed at the onset of stationary phase. Collectively, these results indicate that the overall growth cycle of C burnetii is characteristic of a closed bacterial system and that the replicative form of the organism is the LCV. The experimental model described in this report will allow a global transcriptome and proteome analysis of C. burnetii developmental forms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available