4.5 Article

Correlation between dietary glycemic index and cardiovascular disease risk factors among Japanese women

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 58, Issue 11, Pages 1472-1478

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601992

Keywords

glycemic index; glycemic load; white rice; cardiovascular disease; lipid; glucose; women

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the correlation between dietary glycemic index (GI) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among subjects who consume white rice as a staple food. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted to explore the associations between dietary GI, dietary glycemic load (GL) and dietary intakes, and CVD risk factors. Dietary GI and GL were calculated from a 3-day ( including two consecutive weekdays and one holiday) dietary records. Setting: A weight-reduction program at a municipal health center in Tokyo, Japan. Subjects: A total of 32 women aged 52.5+/-7.2 y participated in the weight-reduction program. Result: The GI food list made for the current study calculated for 91% of carbohydrate intakes measured. The mean dietary GI was 64+/-6, and the mean dietary GL was 150+/-37. Individuals in the highest tertile of GI consumed more carbohydrate, mostly from white rice (P<0.001), and less fat (P<0.01). Individuals in all three groups by tertile of GL showed similar tendencies. In the lowest GI tertile, the highest concentration of HDL-cholesterol and lowest concentration of triacylglycerol and immunoreactive insulin were observed (P<0.01). In the lowest GL tertile, the highest concentration of HDL-cholesterol and the lowest concentration of triacylglycerol were observed (P<0.05). Conclusion: Calculated dietary GI and GL were positively associated with CVD risk factors among the Japanese women who consumed white rice as a staple food.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available