4.5 Review

The use of proteomics for the assessment of clinical samples in research

Journal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 943-952

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.09.002

Keywords

proteomics; clinical proteomics; 2-DE; mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteornics. the analysis of expressed proteins, has been an important developing area of research for the past two decades [Anderson, NG, Anderson, NL. Twenty years of two-dimensional electrophoresis: past, present and future. Electrophoresis 1996; 17:443-53]. Advances in technology have led to a rapid increase in applications to a wide range of samples; from initial experiments using cell lines, more complex tissues and biolouical fluids are now being assessed to establish changes in protein expression. A primary aim of clinical proteornics is the identification of bioniarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of disease, by comparing the proteornic profiles of control and disease, and differing Physiological states. This expansion into clinical samples has not been without difficulties owing to the complexity and dynamic range in Plasma and human tissues including tissue biopsies. The most widely used techniques for analysis of clinical samples are surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry (SELDI-MS) and 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation [Person, MD, Monks, TJ, Lau, SS. An integrated approach to identifying chemically induced posttranslational modifications using comparative MALDI-MS and targeted HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2003; 16:598-6081-mass spectroscopy (MALDI-MS). This review aims to summarise the findings of studies that have used proteomic research methods to analyse samples from clinical studies and to assess the impact that proteomic techniques have had in assessing clinical samples. (C) 2004 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available