4.4 Article

Comparison of the small heat shock proteins αB-crystallin, MKBP, HSP25, HSP20, and cvHSP in heart and skeletal muscle

Journal

HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages 415-425

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00418-004-0711-z

Keywords

ischemia; myofibrils; stress proteins; titin; fiber type

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seven members of the small heat shock protein ( sHSP) family are exceptional with respect to their constitutive high abundance in muscle tissue. It has been suggested that sHSPs displaying chaperone-like properties may stabilize myofibrillar proteins during stress conditions and prevent them from loss of function. In the present study five sHSPs (alphaB-crystallin, MKBP, HSP25, HSP20, and cvHSP) were investigated with respect to similarities and differences of their expression in heart and skeletal muscle under normal and ischemic conditions. In ischemic heart and skeletal muscle these five sHSPs translocated from cytosol to the Z-/I-area of myofibrils. Myofibrillar binding of all sHSPs was very tight and resisted for the most part extraction with 1 M NaSCN or 1 M urea. MKBP and HSP20 became extracted by 1 M NaSCN to a significant extent indicating that these two sHSPs may bind partially to actin-associated proteins which were completely extracted by this treatment. Ultrastructural localization of alphaB-crystallin showed diffuse distribution of immunogold label throughout the entire I-band in skeletal muscle fibers whereas in cardiomyocytes alphaB-crystallin was preferentially located at the N-line position of the I-band. These observations indicate different myofibrillar binding sites of alphaB-crystallin in cardiomyocytes versus skeletal muscle fibers. Further differences of the properties of sHSPs could be observed regarding fiber type distribution of sHSPs. Thus sHSPs form a complex stress - response system in striated muscle tissue with some common as well as some distinct functions in different muscle types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available