4.7 Article

Molecular profiling and classification of sporadic renal cell carcinoma by quantitative methylation analysis

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 21, Pages 7276-7283

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0692

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Preoperative histologic classification of solid renal masses remains limited with current technology. We determine the utility of molecular profiling based on quantitative methylation analysis for characterization of sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Experimental Design: Primary renal cell carcinomas representing three different histologic subtypes were obtained from a total of 38 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for suspected malignant disease. Genomic DNA was isolated from tumors and was subjected to sodium bisulfite modification. The normalized index of methylation (NIM) for each sample was determined by quantitative realtime methylation-specific PCR at 17 different gene promoters. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed by using an unsupervised neural network with binary tree topology. Results: The majority of gene promoters that were analyzed in this study demonstrated very low levels of methylation (NIM < 1.0). The RASSF1A gene promoter, however, was methylated in 30 of 38 (79%) cases. The frequency of RASSF1A methylation in papillary, clear-cell, and oncocytoma subtypes was 100, 90, and 25%, respectively. The highest levels of RASSF1A methylation were observed in the papillary (mean NIM = 78.9) and clear-cell (mean NIM = 13.4) subtypes. The vast majority of oncocytomas were completely unmethylated, and none demonstrated > 1 % methylation (mean NIM = 0.11). Hierarchical cluster analysis based on quantitative methylation levels resulted in stratification of sporadic renal cell carcinomas into their discrete histologic subtypes. Conclusions: Classification of sporadic renal cell carcinomas into histologic subtypes can lie accomplished via multigene quantitative methylation profiling. Validation of this approach and selection of appropriate methylation markers may ultimately lead to use of this technology in the preoperative assessment of suspicious renal masses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available