4.6 Article

Increased expression of toll-like receptor-2 and-4 on leukocytes from patients with sepsis

Journal

SHOCK
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 403-409

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.shk.0000142256.23382.5d

Keywords

endotoxin; TLR; monocytes; neutrophils; sepsis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reduced responsiveness of monocytes or granulocytes toward endotoxin (endotoxin tolerance) during sepsis may depend on Toll-like receptors (TLR). The expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4 was measured on neutrophils (PMN) and monocytes from patients with sepsis (n = 21) or healthy controls (n = 12). Leukocytes (1 x 10(6)/mL) were incubated at 37degreesC with or without a TLR-4 (LPS 1 mug/mL) or a TLR-2 ligand (MALP-2 2 nM). Surface expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4 at 0, 4, and 16 h was determined in FACS after staining with specific antibodies. The release of IL-8 and TNF-alpha was measured by ELISA. Freshly isolated PMN from patients with sepsis exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) higher mean fluorescence for TLR-2 (78.0 +/- 18.6) and TLR-4 (11.4 +/- 2.3) than controls (12.8 +/- 2.2 and 2.3 +/- 0.4). Similarly, monocytes from patients exhibited higher TLR-2 and TLR-4 expression (300.8 +/- 40.6 and 92.7 +/- 12.1) than cells from controls (149.5 +/- 27.1 and 52.2 +/- 7.6). In patients with sepsis, expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4 on PMN increased during 16 h of incubation (106.2 +/- 22.1 and 34.5 +/- 5.3), whereas it remained unchanged in controls (19.3 +/- 6.1 and 5.4 +/- 1.9). Incubation with LPS or MALP-2 had no effect on TLR-4 or TLR-2 expression in cells from either controls or patients. Despite increased TLR expression in cells from patients with sepsis, the endotoxin-induced release of TNF-a and IL-8 was indistinguishable from that in controls. Therefore, the endotoxin tolerance seen in patients with sepsis does not depend solely on TLR-2 or TLR-4 expression, and other mechanisms must be involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available