4.4 Article

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units can be reduced by prompting physicians to remove unnecessary catheters

Journal

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 974-978

Publisher

SLACK INC
DOI: 10.1086/502329

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Indwelling urinary catheters are the most common source of infections in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nurse-generated daily reminders to physicians to remove unnecessary urinary catheters 5 days after insertion. DESIGN: A time-sequence nonrandomized intervention study. SETTING: Adult ICUs (medical, surgical, cardiovascular surgical, neurosurgical, and coronary care) of a tertiary-care university medical center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the adult ICUs during a 2-year period. The study consisted of a 12-month observational phase (15,960 patient-days) followed by a 12-month intervention phase (15,525 patient-days). INTERVENTION: Daily reminders to physicians from the nursing staff to remove unnecessary urinary catheters 5 days after insertion. RESULTS: The duration of urinary catheterization was significantly reduced during the intervention phase (from 7.0 +/-/ 1.1 days to 4.6 +/- 0.7 days; P<.001). The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) was also significantly reduced (from 11.5 +/- 3.1 to 8.3 +/- 2.5 patients with CAUTI per 1,000 catheter-days; P=.009). There was a linear relationship between the monthly average duration of catheterization and the rate of CAUTI (r = 0.50; P=.01). The excess monthly cost of antibiotics for CAUTI was reduced by 69% (from $4,021 +/- $1,800 to $1,220 +/- $941; P=.004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a simple measure instituted as part of a continuous quality improvement program significantly reduced the duration of urinary catheterization, rate of CAUTI, and additional costs of antibiotics to manage CAUTI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available