4.7 Article

On the evolution of star-forming galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 615, Issue 1, Pages 209-221

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/424032

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : starburst; radio continuum : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution in the comoving space density of the global average galaxy star formation rate (SFR) out to a redshift around unity is well established. Beyond z approximate to 1 there is growing evidence that this evolution is flat or even increasing, contrary to early indications of a turnover. Some recent analyses of z approximate to 6 photometric dropouts are suggestive of a decline from z 3 to z approximate to 6, but there is still very little constraint on the extent of dust obscuration at such high redshifts. In less than a decade, numerous measurements of galaxy SFR density spanning z = 0 to as high as z approximate to 6 have rapidly broadened our understanding of galaxy evolution, and a summary of existing SFR density measurements is presented here. This global star formation history compilation is found to be consistent to within factors of about 3 over essentially the entire range 0 < z less than or similar to 6, and it can be used to constrain the evolution of the luminosity function (LF) for star-forming galaxies. The LF evolution for star-forming galaxies has been previously explored using optical source counts, as well as radio source counts at 1.4 GHz, and a well-known degeneracy between luminosity evolution [L proportional to (1 + z)(Q)] and density evolution [phi proportional to (1 + z)(P)] is found. Combining the constraints from the global SFR density evolution with those from the 1.4 GHz radio source counts at submillijansky levels allows this degeneracy to be broken and a best-fitting evolutionary form to be established. The preferred evolution in a H(0) = 70, Omega(M) = 0.3, Omega(Lambda) = 0.7 cosmology from these combined constraints is Q = 2.70 +/- 0.60, P = 0.15 +/- 0.60.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available