4.7 Article

Region-specific cell grafting into cervical and lumbar spinal cord in rat: a qualitative and quantitative stereological study

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 190, Issue 1, Pages 122-132

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.07.014

Keywords

spinal cord; laminae-specific grafting; ALS; ischemia; paraplegia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, we have characterized an atraumatic grafting technique which permits multiple, segmental, and lamina-specific injections into cervical or lumbar spinal cord. Cell injections were performed in spinally mounted rats of different ages and spinal cord size, using a micromanipulator and glass microcapillary connected to a digital microinjector. For grafting, we used human neuroteratoma (hNT) cells, BrdU-labeled rat spinal precursors or primary embryonic spinal cord neurons isolated from E14 spinal cord of the eGFP+ rat. Systematic quantification of grafted cells was performed using stereological principles of systematic random sampling and semi-automated optical Disector software. Volume reconstruction was performed using serial sections from grafted areas and custom-developed software (Ellipse) which permits two reference points semi-automated alignment of images, as well as volume reconstruction and calculation. By coupling these techniques, it is possible to achieve a relatively precise and atraumatic cell delivery into multiple spinal cord segments and specific spinal laminae. Consistency of the multiple grafts position in the targeted laminar areas was verified by a systematic volume reconstruction. Good survival of implanted cells for the three different cell lines used indicate that this grafting technique coupled with a systematic analysis of the individual grafting sites can represent a valuable implantation-analytical system. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available