4.2 Article

Radiologic and patient-reported functional outcomes in an elderly cohort with conservatively treated distal radius fractures

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 29A, Issue 6, Pages 1121-1127

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.002

Keywords

distal radius (wrist) fractures; radiographic reduction; outcomes; satisfaction; elderly patients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: There have been few prospective studies of elderly patients with conservatively treated distal radius fractures and little is known about the relationship between acceptable radiographic reduction and functional outcomes in this population. We hypothesized that acceptable fracture reduction (according to standard radiographic clorsal/volar tilt criteria) would be associated with better functional outcomes and greater satisfaction. Methods: Seventy-four patients who were at least 50 years of age with conservatively managed distal radius fractures were recruited from 2 large urban emergency departments from January 2001 to December 2001. Patients with wrist fractures treated in the emergency department and discharged home were included; patients admitted to the hospital or who required surgical reduction were excluded. Standard lateral radiographs were taken after the final cast was removed. These were reviewed independently by a reference-standard musculoskeletal radiologist and the degree of dorsal/volar tilt was recorded. This value was dichotomized according to standard published dorsal/volar tilt criteria as acceptable (dorsal tilt <10degrees or volar tilt <20degrees) or unacceptable (dorsal tilt >10degrees or volar tilt >20degrees). The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 (SF-12); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; and a patient satisfaction survey were used to assess patient- reported outcomes 6 months after the injury. Results: The average clorsal/volar tilt measured by the reference standard radiologist was 3.4degrees (SD = 13.6) dorsal; overall 47 patients (64%) were considered to have an acceptable radiographic reduction. Acceptable radiographic reduction was not associated with better generic physical or mental health status, lesser degrees of upper-extremity disability, or greater satisfaction with outcomes than was unacceptable reduction. Overall 44 of 74 patients (59%) reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their functional status at 6 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available