4.5 Article

Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 1248-1253

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.016

Keywords

lower limb alignment; high tibial osteotomy; 3-D CT simulation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purposes of this study were to clarify the effects of rotation on two-dimensional measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy using a three-dimensional method and to determine whether this 3-D simulation method could help with planning of knee osteotomy. We developed computer software to calculate femorotibial angle (FTA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and simulate knee osteotomy from a CT-based 3-D bone model of the lower limb. Lower limb rotation on anteroposterior long-standing radiographs was measured by superimposing the 3-D bone models. Changes in alignment with limb rotation were calculated using the software. FTA after virtual closed-wedged osteotomy was measured for a hypothetical case of a rotation error of the osteotomy plane in reattaching the proximal cutting surface to the distal cutting surface. For 31 varus knees in 20 patients with medial compartment arthritis, the mean rotation angle, relative to the epicondylar axis, with variable limb position was 7.4 +/- 3.9degrees of internal rotation (mean +/-SD), ranging from 8degrees of external rotation to 14degrees of internal rotation; the mean changes in FTA and HKA were 3.5 +/- 2.2degrees (range, 0.4-8.6) and 1.6 +/- 1.3degrees (range, 0.2-4.9), respectively. The FTA flexion angle (lateral view alignment from neutral AP) and the absolute HKA flexion angle correlated with the change in FTA and HKA with limb rotation, respectively (FTA, R = 0.999; HKA, R = 0.993). The mean change in FTA after virtual closed-wedged osteotomy was 3.2degrees for internal and external 10degrees rotation errors in reattaching the osteotomy plane. Rotation may affect measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy, and 3-D methods are preferable for surgical planning. (C) 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available