4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Oxygen transport in the SOFC cathode

Journal

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 1162-1169

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:RUEL.0000048649.26180.57

Keywords

La(0.75)Sr(0.2)MnO(3); interfacial resistance; thick film; SOFC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impedance of the La(0.75)Sr(0.2)MnO(3)-cathode/electrolyte interface for cathodes with different porosity is measured. The impedance spectra are fitted using a developed model of the oxygen transport at this interface. After the measurements, the cathode is removed from the electrolyte. The contact area and the three-phase boundary length (TPBL) at the interface are estimated from SEM images of the electrolyte surface. The dependence of the interfacial electrical resistance on the microstructure is discussed. It is shown that the bulk diffusion of oxygen vacancies at the interface at 950degreesC is high enough to use the whole La(0.75)Sr(0.2)MnO(3)/YSZ contact area F for the oxygen transport into the electrolyte for microstructures with 2F/TPBL less than or equal to2 gm. The impact of the surface diffusion of oxygen species on polarization resistance at operation temperatures <900degreesC is discussed. The polarization resistance and the morphology of composite cathodes made from La(0.75)Sr(0.2)MnO(3)/YSZ and yttria- or scandia-stabilized zirconia powders (3YSZ, 8YSZ, 10ScSZ) are investigated by impedance spectroscopy at 800-950degreesC. The polarization (interfacial) resistance decreases gradually with addition of electrolyte powder in the uLSM cathode material independent of the electrolyte powder used. The interfacial resistance of the uLSM/3YSZ, uLSM/8YSZ, and uLSTM/10ScSZ composite cathodes is almost the same. The interaction between uLSM and doped zirconia particles is discussed on the basis of the interfacial resistance, activation energies, and high-frequency impedance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available