4.6 Article

Dynamical mass estimates for five young massive stellar clusters

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages 2295-2305

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/424538

Keywords

galaxies : irregular; galaxies : star clusters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have obtained high-dispersion spectra for four massive star clusters in the dwarf irregular galaxies NGC 4214 and NGC 4449, using the HIRES spectrograph on the Keck I telescope. Combining the velocity dispersions of the clusters with structural parameters and photometry from images taken with the Hubble Space Telescope, we estimate mass-to-light (M/L) ratios and compare these with simple stellar population models in order to constrain the stellar mass functions (MFs) of the clusters. For all clusters we find M/L values that are similar to or slightly higher than for a Kroupa MF and thereby rule out any MF that is deficient in low-mass stars compared with a Kroupa-type MF. The four clusters have virial masses ranging between 2.1 x 10(5) and 1.5 x 10(6) M-., half-light radii between 3.0 and 5.2 pc, estimated core densities in the range 2 x 10(3) to 2 x 10(5) M-. pc(-3), and ages between 200 and 800 Myr. We also present new high-dispersion near-infrared spectroscopy for a luminous young ( similar to 15 Myr) cluster in the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 6946, which we have previously observed with HIRES. The new measurements in the infrared agree well with previous estimates of the velocity dispersion for this cluster, yielding a mass of about 1.7 x 10(6) M-.. Including an improved estimate of the reddening toward this cluster, the new data yield an M/L in excellent agreement with a Kroupa-type MF also for this cluster. The properties of the clusters studied here are all consistent with the clusters being young versions of the old globular clusters found around all major galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available