4.6 Article

The importance of Nonlinear cross-shelf momentum flux during wind-driven coastal upwelling

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 2444-2457

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO2644.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple theory is proposed for steady, two-dimensional, wind-driven coastal upwelling that relates the dynamics and the structure of the cross-shelf circulation to the stratification, bathymetry, and wind stress. The new element is an estimate of the nonlinear cross-shelf momentum flux divergence due to the wind-driven cross-shelf circulation acting on the vertically sheared geostrophic alongshelf flow. The theory predicts that the magnitude of the cross-shelf momentum flux divergence relative to the wind stress depends on the Burger number S = alphaN/f, where alpha is the bottom slope, N is the buoyancy frequency, and f is the Coriolis parameter. For S approximate to 1 ( weak stratification), the cross-shelf momentum flux divergence is small, the bottom stress balances the wind stress, and the onshore return flow is primarily in the bottom boundary layer. For S approximate to 1 or larger (strong stratification), the cross-shelf momentum flux divergence balances the wind stress, the bottom stress is small, and the onshore return flow is in the interior. Estimates of the cross-shelf momentum flux divergence using moored observations from four coastal upwelling regions (0.2 less than or equal to S less than or equal to 1.5) are substantial relative to the wind stress when S approximate to 1 and exhibit a dependence on S that is consistent with the theory. Two-dimensional numerical model results indicate that the cross-shelf momentum flux divergence can be substantial for the time-dependent response and that the onshore return flow shifts from the bottom boundary layer for small S to just below the surface boundary layer for S approximate to 1.5-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available