4.5 Article

Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 1523-1529

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.08.021

Keywords

ultrasound; gene therapy; naked DNA; passive diffusion; muscle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasound (US) is a promising tool for facilitating direct gene transfer to skeletal muscle, but no systematic optimisation study has been performed. We exposed H2K myoblast cells to US with varying intensity of exposure and duration to evaluate its effect on cell viability and transfection efficiency using as endpoints transfection rate, average fluorescence intensity (fluorescence normalised by the number of transfected cells) and overall expression (the product of transfection rate and average fluorescence intensity) as indices. Cell viability decreased with exposure time and intensity, consistent with previous findings. Optimal setting of US was observed at the range of 0.5 to 1 W cm(-2) with duration of 20 s, producing maximum efficiency (transfection = 4.5%) in gene transfection with minimum cell toxicity (cell viability = 83 %). Higher intensity alone or in combination with low intensity and long duration did not improve cell viability and transfection. The increase of eGFP (enhanced green fluorescence protein) plasmid concentration up to 200 mug per mL was related to an increase in average fluorescence intensity and overall expression. However, transfection rate saturated when DNA concentration reached 50 jig per mL despite initial increase with DNA concentration. The average fluorescence intensity was linearly proportional to the logarithm of DNA concentration, suggesting a diffusion-based model for DNA uptake under sonoporation. We conclude that low-intensity US irradiation provides a safe and effective alternative for gene delivery. (C) 2004 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available