4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Male brook sticklebacks' (Culaea inconstans) response to olfactory cues

Journal

BEHAVIOUR
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 1411-1424

Publisher

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/1568539042948132

Keywords

olfaction; sticklebacks; gasterosteids; mate choice; mate recognition; multimodal cues; complex signals; Culaea inconstans; Gasterosteus aculeatus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Male brook sticklebacks were capable of recognizing and discriminating between the scent from nesting, conspecific males and ovulated, conspecific females. In recognition trials, they spent more time near the female, than near the male scent. Males spent more time near the male scent during the choice trials because they decreased the amount the amount of time spent near the female cue. Male brook sticklebacks were capable of recognizing and discriminating between the scent from ovulated conspecific and heterospecific (Gasterosteus aculeatus) females. They were not attracted to the scent from the heterospecific, but they did spend more time near the surface and direct more surface nudges towards the stimulus drip, indicating that they recognized the cue on some level. When the cues were presented together, males spent more time on the conspecific side. Males only directed courtship pummels towards the female-based cue. The intensity of pummeling can be arranged as: number to conspecific female much greater than number heterospecific female > number to conspecific male or water control. The number of courtship pummels directed towards the conspecific female stimulus decreased significantly when the odour of a conspecific male or heterospecific female was present. This paper contributes to the growing database demonstrating that courtship communication in gasterosteids is multimodal, encompassing (minimally) visual and olfactory components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available