4.5 Article

Oral mesalazine (5-ASA) treatment may protect against proximal extension of mucosal inflammation in ulcerative proctitis

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 731-736

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/00054725-200411000-00006

Keywords

corticosteroids; mesalazine; ulcerative colitis; ulcerative proctitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Studies aimed at establishing which characteristics of patients with ulcerative proctitis could be predictive of the extension of inflammation have failed to provide conclusive results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of clinical and therapeutic parameters in patients with proctitis. Patients and Methods: Case records of 138 patients with ulcerative proctitis were retrospectively evaluated. The following parameters were considered: gender; age at onset of disease; smoking habits; histologic severity of disease at onset; mean number of clinical relapses of disease per year; mean duration of oral and topical mesalazine treatment;, and number of topical corticosteroid treatments per year. Results: Twenty-eight patients were excluded from the analysis for different reasons. During follow-up, inflammation spread proximally in 33 of 110 patients (30%), Patients with extended proctitis showed a significantly higher number of relapses and a shorter duration of oral mesalazine treatment than patients with nonprogressive proctitis (P < 0.001 for both). The multivariate analysis also found that the mean duration of topical mesalazine treatment was longer in patients with extended proctitis. Conclusions: Ulcerative proctitis patients with more frequent relapses who need a longer duration of topical therapy are at higher risk of extension of the disease, while a more prolonged oral mesalazine treatment period protects against the proximal spread of rectal inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available