4.2 Article

First episode psychosis: a novel methodology reveals higher than expected incidence; a reality-based population profile in Northumberland, UK

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 539-547

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00474.x

Keywords

database; evaluation programme; first episode psychosis; population; prospective; unselected

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale, Aims and Objectives To document the natural history/clinical course of an unselected population presenting with first episode psychosis across a Mental Health Trust. Method An observational database was set up covering all patients over 15 years of age. Data were collected at pre-sentation and annual follow-up intervals. Results A total of 227 patients presented during the 3 years initial study period with a first episode psychosis. The commonest diagnoses were psychotic depression 19%, paranoid schizophrenia 11%, persistent delusional disorder 7% and bipolar affective disorder 7.5% giving an annual incidence of 30.36 per 100 000 population. At presentation, half had been admitted to hospital, nearly half of whom were detained under the Mental Health Act, and only a quarter were currently employed. Twenty-six per cent had an episode of deliberate self-harm and 14% had harmed others. A recurring pattern emerged of over half the patients being no longer in contact with mental health services 1 year after presentation. Data c ollection is ongoing. Conclusions Clinical and managerial cooperation achieved a practical framework for data collection. This approach in an unselected population of patients yielded new insights into the course of first episode psychosis. The higher incidence than expected from the literature has implications for local strategic planning and provides a framework for detailed evaluation of a complex patient group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available