4.7 Article

Promoter sequences necessary for high-level expression of the plasmid-associated ampC β-lactamase gene blaMIR-1

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 4177-4182

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4177-4182.2004

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about mechanisms involved in high-level expression of plasmid-associated ampC genes. The sequence for bla(MIR-1) has been elucidated, and the gene is not inducible. Although the sequence for the promoter (prA) that drives expression of Enterobacter cloacae chromosomal ampC is present upstream of bla(MIR-1), high-level expression from bla(MIR-1) is directed from a hybrid promoter (prB) located further upstream of prA. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of each promoter on bla(MIR-1) expression and P-lactam resistance. RNA expression by deletion clones with both promoters was measured and compared to that by clones in which -35 and/or -10 elements of prA and/or prB were altered. Primer extension revealed two start sites for bla(MIR-1) transcription. Expression of bla(MIR-1) in clones with both promoters was 171-fold higher than that in clones carrying only prA. In addition, bla(MIR-1) expression from prA increased 11-fold in the presence of the prB -10 element compared to expression driven from prA alone. Ceftazidime and cefotaxime MICs increased 42- and 64-fold, respectively, for the clone expressing blaMIR-1 from both promoters compared to expression from prA alone. The upstream promoter prB of blaMIR-1 is solely responsible for high-level expression required for cefotaxime and ceftazidime resistance. These data suggest that resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins mediated by noninducible plasmid-associated ampC genes requires the formation of novel promoter elements that are capable of increasing ampC expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available