4.6 Article

The effect on cartilage of different forms of application of postmenopausal estrogen therapy: comparison of oral and transdermal therapy

Journal

BONE
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 1216-1221

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.07.017

Keywords

CTX-I; CTX-II; cartilage degradation; postmenopausal women; estradiol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect on urine C-telopeptides of type II collagen (uCTX-II) of oral and transdermal estradiol treatment was compared using samples from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. A total of 171 healthy, Danish postmenopausal women, 45-65 years of age completed the 2-year study periods. The uCTX-II marker assessed cartilage degradation, and this response was compared with the effect on urine C-telopeptides of type I collagen (uCTX-I), considered a specific marker of bone resorption. Doses in the oral estradiol treatment groups (continuous combined therapy) were 1 mg 17-beta-estradiol + 1 mg drosperinone or 1 mg 17-beta-estradiol + 2 mg drosperinone or 1 mg 17-beta-estradiol + 3 mg drosperinone or placebo. Doses in the transdermal estradiol treatment groups (continuous combined therapy) were 45 mug 17-beta-estradiol + 30 levonorgestrel or 45 mug 17-beta-estradiol + 40 mug levonorgestrel or placebo. The effect of oral and transdermal estradiol therapy on cartilage degradation was reflected as a decrease of 19-30% in uCTX-II (P = 0.02 and P = 0.003 vs. placebo) after 1 year of treatment. uCTX-I decreased 70% (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo) reflecting a pronounced effect on bone resorption that was consistent with a 2-year increase in spine and hip BNID of 7-8% and 4-6%, respectively. The results indicate that different regimens of postmenopausal HRT both have an effect on cartilage and bone thus protecting against osteoporosis and osteoarthritis (OA). However, long-term clinical trials are needed to further investigate this issue. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available