4.7 Article

Therapeutic synergy of oral taxane BMS-275183 and cetuximab versus human tumor xenografts

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 21, Pages 7413-7417

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1045

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Combination therapy consisting of an oral taxane, BMS-275183, and the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, cetuximab, was assessed for enhanced therapeutic benefit in preclinical tumor models. Experimental Design: Mice bearing human tumor xenografts, either L2987 lung or GEO colon carcinoma, were administered the aforementioned treatments singly or in combination regimens. Delays in tumor growth and tumor-free status were evaluated and combination treatments were assessed relative to optimal solo treatments. Results: Combination therapies with the oral taxane plus cetuximab were tolerated and therapeutic synergistic outcomes obtained. The therapeutic enhancements were >1 log cell kill greater than the antitumor effect caused by either solo agent applied optimally. For example, at the maximum-tolerated dose of BMS-275183, 60 mglkg/administration, given p.o. once every 3 days for a total of six administrations (q3d X 6), 1.0 gross log cell kill was achieved in mice bearing well established (100 to 200 mg) s.c. implanted L2987 tumors. Cetuximab, at an optimal dose of I mg/mouse, given i.p. q3d x 6, produced 1.3 log cell kill. When cetuximab, I mg/mouse, i.p., plus BMS-275183, 25 mg/kg/ administration, p.o., were both given q3dx6, the result was 2.6 log cell kill with three of eight mice cured (P < 0.01). Similar efficacy benefits were obtained in the GEO tumor model. Conclusions: The combination of oral taxane BMS-275183 plus cetuximab provided therapeutically synergistic antitumor activity in two different human tumor xenograft models. Clinical evaluation of this combination is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available