4.6 Article

C-reactive protein used as an early indicator of infection in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 2038-2045

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2434-y

Keywords

sepsis; systemic inflammatory response syndrome; C-reactive protein; diagnosis; therapy; severe sepsis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic value of a single determination of serum C-reactive protein as a marker of sepsis in critically ill patients. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients and participants: One hundred twenty-five adult patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (55 patients without evidence of infection and 70 patients with the diagnosis of sepsis confirmed by documented infection). Twenty-five patients with non-complicated acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and 50 healthy volunteers were used as controls. Interventions: None. Measurements and results: Serum C-reactive protein concentration was measured within the first 24 h of SIRS onset. Healthy subjects, AMI and non-infectious SIRS patients showed lower C-reactive protein median values ([(0.21 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 0.21-0.4]mg/dl, 2.2 [95% CI, 2.1-4.9] mg/dl and 1.7 [95% CI, 2.4-5.5] mg/dl, respectively) than patients with sepsis (18.9 [95% CI, 17.1-21.8]), p<0.001. The presence of severe sepsis (r(s)=0.27; p=0.03), SOFA score (r(s)=0.25; p=0.03) and arterial lactate (r(s)=0.24; p=0.04) correlated significantly with C-reactive protein concentrations in sepsis cases. The best threshold value for C-reactive protein for predicting sepsis was 8 mg/dl (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 87.3%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for C-reactive protein was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98). Conclusions: Determination of serum C-reactive protein can be used as an early indicator of infection in patients with SIRS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available