4.7 Article

CD20-negative large-cell lymphoma with plasmablastic features: a clinically heterogenous spectrum in both HIV-positive and -negative patients

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1673-1679

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh399

Keywords

EBV-positive; HIV-positive/negative patients; plasmablastic lymphoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) has been described as a rapidly progressive and almost invariably fatal CD20- VS38c+ diffuse large-cell lymphoma with plasmablastic features, almost exclusively involving the jaw and oral mucosa in HIV-positive patients. Methods: From 2001 to 2003 we evaluated 12 men with PBL, and report the pathology, clinical findings, treatment and outcome. Six of 12 were HIV-positive while among the others, one was post-renal transplant, one had ulcerative colitis and four had no known immunodeficiency. Results: Tumor growth pattern, in general, showed cohesiveness and a starry-sky pattern; the morphology varied from typical plasmablastic to centroblastic cells. Partial immunophenotypes were (+/total): CD138, 11 of 12 (91.7%); MIB1 10 of 11 (4+, range 75-95%); p63/VS38c, nine of 10 (90%); EBV, eight of 11 (73%); LCA(CD45), two of 12 (16.7%); HHV8/LANA, zero of 10; ALK, zero of seven; and CD20, zero of 12. Three had stage IE and nine stage IV disease. Nine of 12 had an intermediate/high International Prognostic Index or high-risk disease. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography scan in four of 12 revealed extensive bone metastases. Seven of 12 patients are alive with no evidence of disease at a median follow-up of 15 months (range 7-27+). Of the HIV-positive patients, five of six are alive with a median follow-up of 17 months. Conclusions: It appears that PBL are heterogenous in terms of clinical presentation and morphology. The outcome presented here is superior to that originally reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available