4.6 Article

Electric current-induced detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms from surgical stainless steel

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 11, Pages 6871-6874

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6871-6874.2004

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomaterial-centered infections of orthopedic percutaneous implants are serious complications which can ultimately lead to osteomyelitis, with devastating effects on bone and surrounding tissues, especially since the biofilm mode of growth offers protection against antibiotics and since removal frequently is the only ultimate solution. Recently, it was demonstrated that as a possible pathway to prevent infections of percutaneous stainless steel implants, electric currents of 60 to 100 muA were effective at stimulating the detachment of initially adhering staphylococci from surgical stainless steel. However, initially adhering bacteria are known to adhere more reversibly than bacteria growing in the later stages of biofilm formation. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine whether a growing Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm can be stimulated to detach from surgical stainless steel by the use of electric currents. In separate experiments, four currents, i.e., 60 and 100 muA of direct current (DC) and 60 and 100 muA of block current (50% duty cycle, 1 Hz), were applied for 360 min to stimulate the detachment of an S. epidermidis biofilm that had grown for 200 min. A 100-muA DC yielded 78% detachment, whereas a 100-muA block current under the same experimental conditions yielded only 31% detachment. The same trend was found for 60 muA, with 37% detachment for a DC and 24% for a block current. Bacteria remaining on the surface after the current application were less viable than they were prior to the current application, as demonstrated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. In conclusion, these results suggest that DCs are preferred for curing infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available