4.6 Article

Charge trapping properties of the HfO2 layer with various thicknesses for charge trap flash memory applications

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3337103

Keywords

electrical conductivity; electron traps; elemental semiconductors; flash memories; hafnium compounds; hole traps; internal stresses; leakage currents; MIS capacitors; silicon; silicon compounds; tunnelling

Funding

  1. Korean Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10029944] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [10029945] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MHOS (metal-HfO2-SiO2-Si) structure capacitors were fabricated to investigate the charge trapping properties of HfO2 layer with various thicknesses for the applications of charge trap flash (CTF) memory devices. Also, the centroid of charge trap in HfO2 layer was extracted by constant current stress method and compared with that of conventional Si3N4 layer. The gate leakage current of MHOS capacitor due to tunneling was significantly reduced by stacking the HfO2 trap layer on thin SiO2 tunnel layer. The MHOS capacitors showed a larger memory window than the MNOS (metal-Si3N4-SiO2-Si) capacitors at the same trap layer thickness, because the HfO2 layer has better charge trapping efficiency than the Si3N4 layer. It is found that ultrathin HfO2 trap layer with a thickness of 2 nm stored almost the same charges with Si3N4 layer with a thickness of 7 nm. Consequently, the application of ultrathin HfO2 to charge storage layer can considerably improve the performance and enhance the high density of CTF memory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available