4.7 Article

Resolved molecular gas in a quasar host galaxy at redshift z=6.42

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 615, Issue 1, Pages L17-L20

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/426017

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : ISM; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present high-resolution Very Large Array (VLA) observations of the molecular gas in the host galaxy of the highest redshift quasar currently known, SDSS J1148+5251 (z = 6.42). Our VLA data of the CO (3-2) emission have a maximum resolution of 0.17 x 0.13 (less than or equal to1 kpc) and enable us to resolve the molecular gas emission both spatially and in terms of velocity. The molecular gas in J1148 + 5251 (z = 6.42) is extended to a radius of 2.5 kpc, and the central region shows two peaks separated by 0.3 (1.7 kpc). These peaks account for about half of the total emission, while the remainder is more extended. Each of these unresolved peaks contains a molecular gas mass of similar to5 x 10(9) M-circle dot ( similar to the total mass found in nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies) and has an intrinsic brightness temperature of similar to35 K (averaged over the 1 kpc-sized beam), comparable to what is found in nearby starburst centers. Assuming that the molecular gas is gravitationally bound, we estimate a dynamical mass of similar to4.5 x10(10) M-circle dot within a radius of 2.5 kpc (similar to5.5 x 10(10) M-circle dot if corrected for a derived inclination of i similar to 65degrees). This dynamical mass estimate leaves little room for matter other than the detected molecular gas; in particular, the data are inconsistent with a similar to10(12) M-circle dot stellar bulge that would be predicted based on the M, relation. This finding may indicate that black holes form prior to the assembly of the stellar bulges BH bulge and that the dark matter halos are less massive than those predicted on the basis of the black hole/ bulge mass relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available