4.5 Article

Potentially modifiable psychosocial factors associated with alcohol use during early adolescence

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1503-1515

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.028

Keywords

drug abuse prevention; alcohol; adolescent attitudes; measurement; predictability

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA10725] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to identify factors associated with alcohol use among early adolescents. A survey was administered to all Grade 7 and 8 students in 16 Vermont school districts. The questionnaire covered demographics, alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use, and measures of psychosocial mediators of alcohol use drawn from social cognitive theory. These included positive and negative expectancies about alcohol effects, perceived peer and parent alcohol norms, perceived prevalence of adolescent alcohol use, and confidence in ability to refuse alcohol. Of the 2919 respondents, 29% reported having at least one drink of beer in the preceding 30 days. In logistic regression, factors independently related to risk of drinking beer in the past 30 days were smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.0), marijuana use (OR 3.9, 95% CI 3.0 - 5.2), negative expectancies (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3 - 0.6), parent norms (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 1.7), and estimated percentage of high school students who drink (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 - 1.5). Gender, positive alcohol expectancies, and lack of confidence in ability to refuse alcohol all significantly interacted with peer norm, with these items more strongly associated with alcohol use when peer norm is toward shouldn't drink. Modifiable perceptions of alcohol use were strongly associated with actual use in this adolescent sample, providing a basis for intervention program design. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available