4.7 Article

Quantum statistical mechanics with Gaussians: Equilibrium properties of van der Waals clusters

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 121, Issue 19, Pages 9247-9256

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1804495

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The variational Gaussian wave-packet method for computation of equilibrium density matrices of quantum many-body systems is further developed. The density matrix is expressed in terms of Gaussian resolution, in which each Gaussian is propagated independently in imaginary time beta=(k(B)T)(-1) starting at the classical limit beta=0. For an N-particle system a Gaussian exp[(r-q)(T)G(r-q)+gamma] is represented by its center qis an element ofR(3N), the width matrix Gis an element ofR(3Nx3N), and the scale gammais an element ofR, all treated as dynamical variables. Evaluation of observables is done by Monte Carlo sampling of the initial Gaussian positions. As demonstrated previously at not-very-low temperatures the method is surprisingly accurate for a range of model systems including the case of double-well potential. Ideally, a single Gaussian propagation requires numerical effort comparable to the propagation of a single classical trajectory for a system with 9(N-2+N)/2 degrees of freedom. Furthermore, an approximation based on a direct product of single-particle Gaussians, rather than a fully coupled Gaussian, reduces the number of dynamical variables to 9N. The success of the methodology depends on whether various Gaussian integrals needed for calculation of, e.g., the potential matrix elements or pair correlation functions could be evaluated efficiently. We present techniques to accomplish these goals and apply the method to compute the heat capacity and radial pair correlation function of Ne-13 Lennard-Jones cluster. Our results agree very well with the available path-integral Monte Carlo calculations. (C) 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available