4.6 Article

Structure and performance of different types of agglomerates in cathode catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 573, Issue 1, Pages 61-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.06.022

Keywords

proton-exchange membrane fuel cells; agglomerate model; catalyst layer; Pt utilization; Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we investigate transport and reaction kinetics in agglomerates of cathode catalyst layers used in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Two types of spherical agglomerates are evaluated, which represent limiting structures that can be obtained by distinct synthetic procedures. One type consists of a mixture of carbon/catalyst particles and a proton conducting perfluorosulfonated ionomer (PFSI). The other type consists of carbon/catalyst particles and water-filled pores. The performance of the former type is rationalized on the basis of the well-known Thiele-modulus. Characteristics of the latter type are studied using Nernst-Planck and Poisson equations. Aspects of current conversion, reactant and current distributions and catalyst utilization are explored. In general, the PFSI-filled agglomerates exhibit more homogeneous distributions of reaction rates. Effectiveness factors for these are close to one. However, it was found that proton penetration depths in water-flooded agglomerates could be quite substantial under certain conditions, resulting in unexpectedly high catalyst utilization. The effects of agglomerate radius and of boundary conditions on the agglomerate surface are studied. An approximate analytical solution was obtained for a planar geometry of agglomerates. The significance of these results for the optimization catalyst layers in the light of operation conditions and synthesis methods is discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available