4.5 Review

Simple equations for dynamic models of the effects of CO2 and O3 on light-use efficiency and growth of crops

Journal

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
Volume 179, Issue 1, Pages 39-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.05.002

Keywords

Triticum aestivum; wheat; detoxification; damage; repair; rubisco; photosynthesis; light intensity; temperature

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and O-3 are increasing, which is expected to affect light-use efficiency (LUE) and yield of crops. We derive a mathematical formula for crop LUE as a function of CO2, temperature, light intensity and the Rubisco content of upper leaves. A corollary formula is derived that expresses the sensitivity of crop growth rate to changes in Rubisco, under various conditions. Both formulas were incorporated in an existing wheat model, together with new equations that represent the effects Of O-3. Five parameters were defined that quantify O-3 relations: (1) the amount of Rubisco damaged per unit O-3, (2, 3) rate and metabolic Costs of O-3 detoxification, (4, 5) rate and costs of repair. For quantification of the damage coefficient and repair rate, equations were developed that can be applied to gas exchange measurements in plants subjected to stepwise increase in ambient ozone concentration. The model was parameterised for spring wheat using literature data. Model simulations were carried out for various time courses of O-3, CO2, temperature, light intensity, to explain reports in the literature on variation in crop response to elevated CO2 and O-3 under different climatic conditions. In spite of model simplicity, simulations explained much of reported variation in crop response to elevated levels of CO2 and O-3. The need and use of additional experimentation is discussed, as is the scope for analysing plant defence strategies in terms of investment in detoxification and repair. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available