4.8 Article

Characterization of redox processes in shallow groundwater of Owens Dry Lake, California

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 22, Pages 5950-5957

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es0306112

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redox status of shallow groundwaters (1-3 m depths) at Owens Dry Lake was studied to help guide mitigation efforts for attenuating dust generation from the dry lakebed. Redox conditions were characterized by E-h, oxidative capacity (OXC), and terminal electron accepting processes (TEAPs) as well as examining the energetics of TEAPs. Groundwater chemistry related to redox status was determined by major solute concentrations, dissolved gases (O-2, H-2, CH4) aqueous redox species (NO3-, Mn2+, Fe2+/ Fe3+, SO42-/HS-, DOC), and major redox sensitive components in the solid phase (extractable Fe/Mn). All of these measures of redox status indicate that sulfate reduction is the major process regulating redox conditions in most shallow groundwaters of Owens Dry Lake. Dissolved sulfate concentrations were regulated primarily by evaporation resulting in increasing concentrations as water migrates from the shoreline (<1 mM) to the center (up to 417 mM) of the dry lakebed. E-h values were generally in the range of -240 to -170 mV. The oxidative capacity demonstrates the dominant contribution of sulfate to OXC. The dominance of sulfate restricts further redox development, such as methanogenesis. Dissolved H-2 concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 7.8 nM. According to the empirically defined H-2 ranges, sulfate reduction was the most predominant TEAP. Moreover, thermodynamic calculations of TEAPs for H-2 utilization support favorable energetics for both sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. The calculated available energy yield for sulfate reduction in the shallow groundwater of Owens Dry Lake was higher than other systems due to the high sulfate concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available