4.8 Article

Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407368101

Keywords

calcium imaging; computational model; motion detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The computational structure of an optimal motion detector was proposed to depend on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the stimulus: At low SNR, the optimal motion detector should be a correlation or Reichardt type, whereas at high SNR, the detector would employ a gradient scheme [Potters, M. & Bialek, W. (1994) J. Physiol (Paris) 4, 1755-1775]. Although a large body of experiments supports the Reichardt detector as the processing scheme leading to direction selectivity in fly motion vision, in most of these studies the SNR was rather low. We therefore reinvestigated the question over a much larger SNR range. Using 2-photon microscopy, we found that local dendritic [Ca2+] modulations, which are characteristic of Reichardt detectors, occur in response to drifting gratings over a wide range of luminance levels and contrasts. We also explored, as another fingerprint of Reichardt detectors, the dependence of the velocity optimum on the pattern wavelength. Again, we found Reichardt-typical behavior throughout the whole luminance and contrast range tested. Our results, therefore, provide strong evidence that only a single elementary processing scheme is used in fly motion vision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available