3.8 Article

Ethanol increases retinoic acid production in cerebellar astrocytes and in cerebellum

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages 233-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.09.003

Keywords

fetal alcohol syndrome; cerebellar astrocyte; cerebellum; retinoic acid

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [AA12092] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG13566] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [HD 05515] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several characteristics of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) are similar to the teratogenic effects of retinoic acid (RA) exposure. It has been suggested that FAS may result from ethanol-induced alteration in endogenous RA synthesis, leading to abnormal embryonic concentrations of this morphogen. We examined whether ethanol may interfere with RA synthesis in the postnatal cerebellum, as a region of the developing CNS particularly vulnerable to both ethanol and RA teratogenesis. It was found that astrocytes are the predominant source of postnatal RA synthesis in the cerebellum. They express both retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 1 and 2. In vitro cytosolic preparations of astrocytes, as well as live cell preparations, have an increased capacity to synthesize RA in the presence of ethanol. A mechanism by which ethanol could stimulate RA synthesis is via the ethanol-activated short-chain retinol dehydrogenases, which we show to be present in the postnatal cerebellum. To determine whether ethanol stimulated RA synthesis in vivo, a sensitive and highly specific HPLC/MSn technique was used to measure cerebellar RA after administration of ethanol to postnatal day 4 rat pups. Cerebellar RA levels climbed significantly after such treatment. These results suggest that the cerebellar pathology exerted by ethanol may occur, at least in part, through increased production of RA. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available