4.7 Article

Gene expression profile of long-lived Ames dwarf mice and Little mice

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 423-441

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00125.x

Keywords

aging; Ames dwarf; gene expression; Little mice; microarray analysis; mouse models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ames dwarf mice (Prop1(df/df)) and Little mice (Ghrhr(lit/lit)) are used as models of delayed aging and show significant increases in lifespan (50% and 25%, respectively) when compared with their wild-type siblings. To gain further insight into the molecular basis for the extended longevity of these mice, we used oligonucleotide microarrays to measure levels of expression of over 14 000 RNA transcripts in liver during normal aging at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. We found that the Prop1(df/df) and Ghrhr(lit/lit) genotypes produce dramatic alterations in gene expression, which are predominantly maintained at all ages. We found 1125 genes to be significantly affected by the Prop1(df/df) genotype and 1152 genes were significantly affected by the Ghrhr(lit/lit) genotype; 547 genes were present in both gene lists and showed parallel changes in gene expression, suggesting common mechanisms for the extended longevity in these mutants. Some of the functional gene classes most affected in these mutants included: amino acid metabolism, TCA cycle, mitochondrial electron transport, fatty acid, cholesterol and steroid metabolism, xenobiotic metabolism and oxidant metabolism. We found that the Prop1(df/df) genotype, and to a minor extent the Ghrhr(lit/lit) genotype, also produced complex alterations in age-dependent changes in gene expression as compared with wild-type mice. In some cases these alterations reflected a partial delay or deceleration of age-related changes in gene expression as seen in wild-type mice but they also introduced age-related changes that are unique for each of these mutants and not present in wild-type mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available