4.7 Article

Prevalence of endocrine diseases and abnormal glucose tolerance tests in 340 Caucasian premenopausal women with hirsutism as the referral diagnosis

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages 1570-1579

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.040

Keywords

hirsutism; PCOS; evaluation; endocrine disease; oral glucose tolerance test; diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To perform an audit on the examination of hirsute patients and to establish a rational routine examination program in an outpatient endocrine clinic. Design: Systematic, retrospective audit. Setting: Academic tertiary-care medical center. Patient(s): Three hundred forty women with hirsutism as the referral diagnosis. Intervention(s): Hormone analyses and ACTH tests during cycle days 2-8, 2 hours of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and vaginal ultrasound. Main Outcome Measure(s): End diagnosis, fasting, 30-, 60-, and 120-minute oral glucose-stimulated levels of insulin and capillary blood glucose. Result(s): Two hundred one patients were diagnosed as having idiopathic hirsutism (IH) and 134 as having polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). End diagnosis: prolactinoma: n = 1, Cushing's syndrome: n = 1, androgen-producing ovarian tumor: n = 1, late-onset 21-hydroxylase defects: n = 2. During OGTT, 4.9% (13 of 263) had previously undiagnosed diabetes; no significant difference in diabetes prevalence was found between idiopathic hirsutism and PCOS. For 50.8%, fasting insulin values were in the upper quartile for a reference population. Conclusion(s): Initial evaluation of hirsute patients with irregular menses should include serum (s)-17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, s-prolactin, s-Testosterone (T), and s-sex hormone-binding globulin. Further evaluation is needed in patients with markedly elevated s-T or with clinical Cushing's syndrome. Hirsute patients have a high risk of diabetes, although this could be due to the high number of overweight patients among this population. (C) 2004 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available