4.6 Article

Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages 2084-2090

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.94.12.2084

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [F31HS013265, F31 HS013265] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL69403, R01 HL069403] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [5T32GM07309, T32 GM007309] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We examined the association between patient race/ethnicity and patient-physician communication during medical visits. Methods. We used audiotape and questionnaire data collected in 1998 and 2002 to determine whether the quality of medical-visit communication differs among African American versus White patients. We analyzed data from 458 African American and White patients who visited 61 physicians in the Baltimore, Md-Washington, DC-Northern Virginia metropolitan area. Outcome measures that assessed the communication process, patient-centeredness, and emotional tone (affect) of the medical visit were derived from audiotapes coded by independent raters. Results. Physicians were 23% more verbally dominant and engaged in 33% less patient-centered communication with African American patients than with White patients. Furthermore, both African American patients and their physicians exhibited lower levels of positive affect than White patients and their physicians did. Conclusions. Patient-physician communication during medical visits differs among African American versus White patients. Interventions that increase physicians' patient-centeredness and awareness of affective cues with African Americans patients and that activate African American patients to participate in their health care are important strategies for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available