4.5 Article

Functional characterization of mouse α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors stably expressed in HEK293T cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages 1138-1150

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02801.x

Keywords

aequorin; calcium; heterologous expression; luminescence; methyllycaconitine

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-14369] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mouse alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAchRs) were stably expressed in HEK293T cells. The function of this stable cell line, termed mmalpha4beta2, was assessed using an aequorin-based luminescence method that measures agonist-evoked changes in intracellular calcium. Agonist-elicited changes in intracellular calcium were due primarily to direct entry of calcium through the alpha4beta2 channel, although release of calcium from intracellular stores contributed 28% of the agonist-evoked response. Agonist pharmacologies were very similar between the mmalpha4beta2 cells and most cell lines that stably express human alpha4beta2 nAchRs. Based on agonist profiles and sensitivity to the antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE), the predominant alpha4beta2 nAchR expressed in the mmalpha4beta2 cells exhibits a pharmacology that most resembles the DHbetaE-sensitive component of Rb-86(+) efflux from mouse brain synaptosomes. However, when evaluated with the aequorin assay, the mmalpha4beta2 nAchR was found to be atypically sensitive to blockade by the presumed alpha7-selective antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), exhibiting an IC50 value of 31 +/- 0.1 nM. Similar IC50 values have been reported for the MLA inhibition of nicotine-stimulated dopamine release, a response that is mediated by beta2-subunit-containing nAchRs and not alpha7-subunit-containing nAchRs. Consequently, at low nanomolar concentrations, MLA may not be as selective for alpha7-containing nAchRs as previously thought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available