4.6 Article

Determination of bubble size distributions in bubble columns using LDA

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 50, Issue 12, Pages 3068-3084

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10274

Keywords

LDA; bubble columns; multi-phase flow; statistical analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method is developed for the determination of bubble size distributions from experimental laser Doppler anemometry, (LDA) data through simultaneous measurement of only two orthogonal velocity components and the intermittent time gaps arising out of bubbles passing through the measurement point. An experimentally verifiable assumption of axisymmetry allowed the calculation of the three-dimensional velocity distributions from the two-dimensional measurement through the elegant use of a mathematical transform called Abel's transform. In conjunction with the use of probability theory, it allows calculation of the chord length distribution. The bubble size distribution is obtained by an inversion procedure, which facilitates the transformation of chord lengths to bubble sizes. The inversion procedure is successfully tested with Monte Carlo simulations, in which bubbles of prescribed size distribution were generated for obtaining. given point in synthetic data on subtended chord lengths at any the column. It is unambiguously demonstrated that assumptions that do not account for correlation between bubble size and direction of motion can yield highly erroneous size distributions from chord length data. The procedure was then used on experimental chord length distributions obtained using LDA to estimate local bubble size distributions in our bubble column. It is particularly, interesting to observe that the mean bubble size estimated from the calculated bubble size distributions were consistent with an estimation based on slip velocity information in accord with the Zuber-Findlay drift flux model. (C) 2004 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available