4.3 Article

Application of acoustic Doppler current profiler combined with a scientific echo sounder for krill Euphausia pacifica density estimation

Journal

FISHERIES SCIENCE
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 1051-1060

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC FISHERIES SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2004.00905.x

Keywords

acoustic Doppler current profiler; distorted wave Born approximation model; echo intensity; Euphausia pacifica identification; krill identification; mean volume backscattering strength; scientific echosounder

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An application of the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP, 153.6 kHz) in combination with a scientific echo sounder (EK60, 38 and 200 kHz) was investigated to estimate the density of krill Euphausia pacifica. The acoustic backscattering strength from sound scattering layers was compared with biomass estimates from midwater trawls. Euphausia pacifica was targeted among mixed species populations in the sound scattering layer in the offshore Funka Bay area of Hokkaido, Japan. The frequency characteristics of acoustic backscattering by krill were calculated using a distorted wave Born approximation scattering model at three frequencies. Krill aggregations identified from the EK60 data were extracted as the mean volume backscattering strength difference between two frequencies. They were then used to identify similar aggregations in the ADCP data by matching observation times and depths for the two methods, which were applied simultaneously. Results from the comparison of the mean volume backscattering strength and the density calculated from the ADCP and EK60 showed that ADCP can be used to measure density and spatial-temporal distribution of krill aggregations. Current speed and direction at the study site were found to be 16.1 cm/s and 187.00, respectively, and krill speed and direction (including the current component) were found to be 19.8 cm/s and 172.20, respectively Based on the ADCP data, the net speed and direction of the krill aggregations were found to be 5.9 cm/s and 128.00, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available