4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Methodology in practice: Statistical misspecification testing

Journal

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 1007-1025

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/425064

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing availability of computer power and statistical software has greatly increased the case with which practitioners apply statistical methods, but this has not been accompanied by attention to checking the assumptions on which these methods are based. At the same time, disagreements about inferences based on statistical research frequently revolve around whether the assumptions are actually met in the studies available, e.g., in psychology, ecology, biology, risk assessment. Philosophical scrutiny can help disentangle 'practical' problems of model validation, and conversely, a methodology of statistical model validation can shed light on a number of issues of interest to philosophers of science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available