4.5 Article

Effect of pimecrolimus cream 1% on the long-term course of pediatric atopic dermatitis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 978-983

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02121.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background This report investigates the effect of pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel(R), Novartis pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland), a nonsteroid, cell-selective, cytolkine inhibitor on the course of atopic dermatitis (AD), as assessed by changes in body surface involvement and pattern of drug use over time. Methods Data from 961 patients in two 1-year double-blind, multicenter, pediatric studies of similar design were analyzed: 250 infants (aged 3-23 months) were randomized 4 : 1 and 711 children (aged 2-17 years) were randomized 2 :1 to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% orvehicle, respectively. Emollients were used by all patients to alleviate dry skin and, at the first signs or symptoms of AD, pimecrolimus or vehicle was applied twice daily to prevent progression to flares. If flares occurred in either group, moderately potent topical corticosteroids were mandated. Results Pimecrolimus was applied for 68.4% (infants) and 53.8% (children) of study days, and frequency of use of pimecrolimus decreased over time, reflecting improvement in disease control. The mean total body surface area affected decreased continuously over time. Significantly more patients in the pimecrolimus than control groups were maintained without corticosteroid therapy (infants: 63.7% vs. 34.8%, P < 0.001; children: 57.4% vs. 31.6%, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The need for pimecrolimus therapy decreases over time as the patients' disease improves. Hence, once long-term management of AD with pimecrolimus is established, the burden of disease for both the patient and the caregiver decreases significantly and disease-free periods become more frequent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available