4.2 Review

Keratosis obturans and external ear canal cholesteatoma: how and why we should distinguish between these conditions

Journal

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 577-581

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00898.x

Keywords

external ear; keratosis obturans; cholesteatoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Keratosis obturans and external ear canal cholesteatomas have been considered as separate entities for the last 20 years, after being regarded as variations of the same disease for at least 87 years. While both disorders are distinct, they do have some overlapping characteristics which may make it difficult to reach a definite diagnosis. This review explores the diagnostic dilemmas which may arise, and discusses the classification, aetiology, pathogenesis and management of these conditions. We concur that external ear canal cholesteatoma and keratosis obturans are different conditions and conclude that the presence of osteonecrosis and focal overlying epithelial loss are the most reliable features favouring the diagnosis of external ear canal cholesteatoma over keratosis obturans. Furthermore, whilst keratosis obturans can be managed successfully by regular aural toilet, external ear canal cholesteatoma may require surgical intervention depending on the extent of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available