4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The impact of ATP-sensitive K+ channel subtype selectivity of insulin secretagogues for the coronary vasculature and the myocardium

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages S156-S164

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.suppl_3.S156

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin secretagogues (sulfonylureas and glinides) increase insulin secretion by closing the ATP-sensitive K(+) channel (K(ATP) channel) in the pancreatic beta-cell membrane. K(ATP) channels subserve important functions also in the heart. First, K(ATP) channels in coronary myocytes contribute to the control of coronary blood flow at rest and in hypoxia. Second, K(ATP) channels in the sarcolemma of cardiomyocytes (sarcK(ATP) channels) are required for adaptation of the heart to stress. In addition, the opening of sarcK(ATP) channels and of K(ATP) channels in the inner membrane of mitochondria (mitoK(ATP) channels) plays a central role in ischemic preconditioning. Opening of sarcK(ATP) channels also underlies the ST-segment elevation of the electrocardiogram, the primary diagnostic tool for initiation of lysis therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, inhibition of cardiovascular K(ATP) channels by insulin secretagogues is considered to increase cardiovascular risk. Electrophysiological experiments have shown that the secretagogues differ in their selectivity for the pancreatic over the cardiovascular K(ATP) channels, being either highly selective (similar to1,000X; short sulfonylureas such as nateglinide and mitiglinide), moderately selective (10-20x; long sulfonylureas such as glibenclamide [glyburide]), or essentially nonselective (<2x; repaglinide). New binding studies presented here give broadly similar results. In clinical studies, these differences are not yet taken into account. The hypothesis that the in vitro selectivity of the insulin secretagogues is of importance for the cardiovascular outcome of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease needs to be tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available