4.8 Article

Surface plasmon resonance: Theoretical evolutionary design optimization for a model analyte sensitive absorbing-layer system

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 76, Issue 23, Pages 6861-6870

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac0496751

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) has been widely used in a Kretschmann configuration to study optical thickness changes of layers on a Au surface in response to an analyte. The method has been popularized and optimized for protein layers, but has also been used in the same format for other layers without further optimization including those absorbing at the incident wavelength. In this paper, we examine whether SPR remains the best attenuated reflectivity format for absorbing overlayers. Experimental data from the SPR response of a copper phthalocyanine film to nitrogen dioxide are used as an input example for a design process using an evolutionary algorithm. The data showed a trend toward thinner gold layer systems (similar to25 nm gave an contrast-enhancement of 42.9% compared with similar to50-nm Au) or Au-free solutions including a layer with low refractive index. From the evolutionary design predictions, further modification could be tested based on available materials and redundant layers could be eliminated from the final selection. By inclusion of the external optics, a design could be selected to accommodate poor precision (+/-0.5degrees) in the incident angle and a possible multilayer solution was shown using Teflon AF 1600, with refractive index similar to1.3. The predicted NO2 response showed an improvement compared with the classical SPR configuration, and the incident angle chosen by the SGA for the interrogation of these layers was close to a stationary point in the absolute response curve, thus offering very good tolerance to automatic position referencing to the reflectivity minimum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available