4.7 Article

Trolox attenuates mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and proteolysis

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200407-939OC

Keywords

antioxidant; protein degradation; rat; weaning

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL62361] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prolonged mechanical ventilation results in diaphragmatic oxidative injury, elevated proteolysis, fiber atrophy, and reduced force-generating capacity. We tested the hypothesis that antioxidant infusion during mechanical ventilation would function as an antioxidant to maintain redox balance within diaphragm muscle fibers and therefore prevent oxidative stress and subsequent proteolysis and contractile dysfunction. Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, tracheostomized, and mechanically ventilated with 21% O-2 for 12 hours. The antioxidant Trolox was intravenously infused in a subset of ventilated animals. Compared with acutely anesthetized, nonventilated control animals, mechanical ventilation resulted in a significant reduction (-17%) in diaphragmatic maxima tetanic force. Importantly, Trolox completely attenuated this mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragmatic contractile deficit. Total diaphragmatic proteolysis was increased 105% in mechanical ventilation animals compared with controls. In contrast, diaphragmatic proteolysis did not differ between controls and mechanical ventilation-Trolox animals. Moreover, 20S proteasome activity in the diaphragm was elevated in the mechanical ventilation animals (+76%); Trolox treatment attenuated this mechanical ventilation-induced rise in protease activity. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that mechanical ventilation-induced oxidative stress is an important factor regulating mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragmatic proteolysis and contractile dysfunction. Our findings suggest that antioxidant therapy could be beneficial during prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available