4.3 Article

Genetic analysis of Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor (TIR) domain sequences from rhesus macaque Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 1-10 reveals high homology to human TLR/TIR sequences

Journal

IMMUNOGENETICS
Volume 56, Issue 9, Pages 667-674

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-004-0734-6

Keywords

Toll-like receptors (TLRs); Toll/Interleukin-1; receptor (TIR) domain; rhesus macaque; phylogeny; structure prediction

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL62056] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI41870] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) form a major group of pattern recognition receptors of the innate immune system that sense molecular patterns on microbes. The cytoplasmic Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor (TIR) signaling domain is instrumental in inducing a signaling cascade upon recognition of specific ligands by TLRs. Because nonhuman primates are used as models of infectious and immune processes, we sought to obtain an increased understanding of nonhuman primate TLRs. We obtained the nucleotide sequences of the TIR domains of rhesus macaque TLRs 1 - 10 and examined their genetic relationships to TLRs from humans and mice. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences revealed macaque-specific changes mostly outside the conserved Box regions of the TLR/TIR domain. Assessment of mutational biases among TLRs from multiple species revealed a strong overall bias towards synonymous substitutions, with a few short regions showing evidence for positive selection outside the Box regions. This first presentation of the TLR/TIR domain sequences from nonhuman primates indicates that although there are species-specific differences, a high level of sequence homology exists in the critical signaling Box regions of macaque, human, and murine TLR/TIR domains. These findings suggest that animal models, including nonhuman primates, will be useful in modeling human TLR pathophysiology and therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available