4.5 Article

Dehydration kinetics of piroxicam monohydrate and relationship to lattice energy and structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages 3013-3026

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20191

Keywords

X-ray diffractometry; ab initio calculations; crystal structure; hydrates/solvates; kinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dehydration kinetics of piroxicam monohydrate (PM) is analyzed by both model-free and model-fitting approaches. The conventional model-fitting approach assuming a fixed mechanism throughout the reaction is found to be too simplistic. The model-free approach allows for a change of mechanism and activation energy, Ea, during the course of a reaction and is therefore more realistic. The complexity of the dehydration of PM is illustrated by the dependence of Ea on both the heating conditions, isothermal or nonisothermal, and on the fraction of conversion, alpha (0 less than or equal to alpha less than or equal to 1). Under both isothermal and nonisothermal conditions, Ea increases with a for 0 less than or equal to alpha less than or equal to 0.25, followed by an approximately constant value of Ea during further dehydration. In the constant-Ea region, isothermal dehydration follows the two-dimensional phase boundary model (112), whereas nonisothermal dehydration follows a mechanism intermediate between two-and three-dimensional diffusion that cannot be described by any of the common models. Structural studies suggest that the complex hydrogen-bond pattern in PM is responsible for the observed dehydration behavior. Ab initio calculations provide an explanation for the changes in the molecular and crystal structures accompanying the reversible change in hydration state between anhydrous piroxicam Form I and PM. This work also demonstrates the utility of model-free analysis in describing complex dehydration kinetics. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available